proposal
A proposed response to a
driver, before it is consented. On the design loop: signal → insight → driver → proposal → agreement. When consented, a proposal yields anagreement.
Serialized type: proposal
Frontmatter
| Field | Required | Format | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
type | yes | proposal | Entity type |
derived-from | no | wikilink or list | The driver (and rungs below it) this responds to (see note) |
for-domain / for_domain | no | wikilink or list | The domain — a work system, a role or a unit — the proposal concerns. Naming a role lands the proposal on every keeper of that role |
status | no | draft | in-consent | consented | declined | Where the proposal is in its decision |
Plus the shared optionals from conventions.
Body
| Section | Holds |
|---|---|
## Proposal | What is proposed — the change, or the agreement-to-be |
## Objections | Objections / concerns raised during consent (optional) |
## Outcome | Consented or declined; a link to the resulting agreement |
Example
---type: proposalderived-from: "[[Standard-order hand-off has no owner]]"for-domain: "[[Strategic Direction]]"status: consented---## ProposalIntroduce a Standard Order Fulfillment protocol: Sales acknowledges within 24h; Assemblyconfirms a slot on intake.
## ObjectionsCapacity contention with custom orders may break the slot promise in peak weeks.
## OutcomeConsented 2026-05-11 → [[Standard Order Fulfillment Protocol]].Reading it
- The question: what response is proposed to which driver, and where is it in its decision?
- Look first:
status, then## Proposal;## Outcomerecords the result and links the agreement that followed. - Go next: back along
derived-fromto the driver and the rungs below it; up viafor-domainto the domain the proposal concerns. - Backlinks: the decision record whose
derived-fromnames it, or the agreements consented directly from it. - Pictured in: the change trail, between driver and decision record;
declinedcloses it, and one nothing derives from yet is an open end. Adwsd.change-trailfence witharound: selfkeeps its own line.
Notes
derived-fromis metadata (the parser has no such relationship type yet), as ondriverandinsight.- Out of scope: how the change is accompanied — the facilitation workflow, who acts when, how consent is run — is an application concern, not part of this spec. The spec defines the artifacts (proposal, agreement); the process around them lives in the tooling.
Like what you see? → Start — build your own org folder in ~2 min